From 7d07beb7d6a79e9d2cd8497db9315992714d8d27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: DocNR Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 14:10:51 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] design doc update --- docs/design_doc.md | 254 ++++++++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/design_doc.md b/docs/design_doc.md index a18371b..19a9ea0 100644 --- a/docs/design_doc.md +++ b/docs/design_doc.md @@ -1,231 +1,137 @@ -# POWR Database Implementation PRD +# [Feature Name] Design Document ## Problem Statement -POWR requires a robust SQLite database implementation that enables local-first fitness tracking while supporting future Nostr protocol integration. The database must efficiently handle exercise definitions (NIP-33401), workout templates (NIP-33402), and workout records (NIP-33403) while maintaining a clean separation between local storage needs and Nostr protocol compatibility. +[Concise description of the problem being solved] ## Requirements ### Functional Requirements -- Store and process exercise definitions with complete metadata -- Support workout template creation and management -- Track workout records and performance history -- Enable efficient content querying and filtering -- Handle both local and Nostr-sourced content seamlessly -- Support offline-first operations with sync capabilities -- Manage template dependencies and incomplete references -- Track exercise history and performance metrics -- Support batch operations and migrations +- [List of must-have functionality] +- [User-facing features] +- [Core capabilities] ### Non-Functional Requirements -- Query response time < 100ms for common operations -- Support concurrent read/write operations safely -- Minimize memory usage through efficient caching -- Maintain data integrity across sync operations -- Scale to handle 1000+ exercises and 100+ templates -- Support incremental sync with Nostr relays -- Ensure consistent performance on mobile devices -- Support automated testing and validation +- Performance targets +- Security requirements +- Reliability goals +- Usability standards ## Design Decisions -### 1. Storage Architecture -Use a dual storage approach with separate tables for raw events and processed data: +### 1. [Major Decision Area] +[Description of approach chosen] Rationale: -- Maintains perfect relay replication capability -- Enables efficient local querying -- Supports dependency tracking -- Facilitates future sync operations -- Allows for flexible schema evolution +- [Key reason] +- [Supporting factors] +- [Trade-offs considered] -### 2. Cache Management -Implement an LRU cache system with configurable limits: +### 2. [Major Decision Area] +[Description of approach chosen] Rationale: -- Improves read performance for common queries -- Manages memory usage effectively -- Supports write buffering for batch operations -- Provides tunable performance controls - -### 3. Schema Design -Use a normalized schema with proper constraints and indexing: - -Rationale: -- Ensures data integrity -- Enables efficient querying -- Supports future extensions -- Maintains clear relationships +- [Key reason] +- [Supporting factors] +- [Trade-offs considered] ## Technical Design -### Core Schema -```sql --- Schema Version -CREATE TABLE schema_version ( - version INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, - updated_at INTEGER NOT NULL -); - --- Raw Events -CREATE TABLE nostr_events ( - id TEXT PRIMARY KEY, - kind INTEGER NOT NULL, - pubkey TEXT NOT NULL, - created_at INTEGER NOT NULL, - content TEXT, - raw_event TEXT NOT NULL, - source TEXT DEFAULT 'local' -); - --- Processed Exercises -CREATE TABLE exercise_definitions ( - event_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY, - title TEXT NOT NULL, - type TEXT NOT NULL, - category TEXT NOT NULL, - equipment TEXT, - description TEXT, - format_json TEXT, - format_units_json TEXT, - FOREIGN KEY(event_id) REFERENCES nostr_events(id) -); - --- Templates -CREATE TABLE workout_templates ( - event_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY, - title TEXT NOT NULL, - type TEXT NOT NULL, - category TEXT NOT NULL, - description TEXT, - rounds INTEGER, - duration INTEGER, - interval_time INTEGER, - rest_between_rounds INTEGER, - created_at INTEGER NOT NULL, - FOREIGN KEY(event_id) REFERENCES nostr_events(id) -); -``` - ### Core Components - ```typescript -interface DbService { - // Core database operations - executeSql(sql: string, params?: any[]): Promise; - withTransaction(operation: () => Promise): Promise; - - // Migration handling - getCurrentVersion(): Promise; - migrate(targetVersion?: number): Promise; +// Key interfaces/types +interface ComponentName { + // Critical fields } -interface CacheManager { - // Cache configuration - maxExercises: number; - maxTemplates: number; - writeBufferSize: number; - - // Cache operations - get(key: string): Promise; - set(key: string, value: T): Promise; - invalidate(key: string): Promise; +// Core functionality +function mainOperation() { + // Key logic } ``` +### Integration Points +- [System interfaces] +- [External dependencies] +- [API definitions] + ## Implementation Plan -### Phase 1: Core Infrastructure (Week 1-2) -1. Set up base schema and migrations -2. Implement DbService class -3. Add basic CRUD operations -4. Create test infrastructure +### Phase 1: [Initial Phase] +1. [Step 1] +2. [Step 2] +3. [Step 3] -### Phase 2: Cache Layer (Week 2-3) -1. Implement CacheManager -2. Add LRU caching -3. Configure write buffering -4. Add cache invalidation - -### Phase 3: Query Layer (Week 3-4) -1. Build query builders -2. Implement common queries -3. Add search functionality -4. Optimize performance - -### Phase 4: Nostr Integration (Week 4-5) -1. Add event processing -2. Implement sync logic -3. Handle dependencies -4. Add relay management +### Phase 2: [Next Phase] +1. [Step 1] +2. [Step 2] +3. [Step 3] ## Testing Strategy ### Unit Tests -- Schema creation and migrations -- CRUD operations for all entities -- Cache operations and invalidation -- Query builder functions +- [Key test areas] +- [Critical test cases] +- [Test tooling] ### Integration Tests -- End-to-end workflow testing -- Template dependency handling -- Sync operations -- Performance benchmarks - -### Performance Tests -- Query response times -- Cache hit rates -- Write operation latency -- Memory usage patterns +- [End-to-end scenarios] +- [Cross-component tests] +- [Test environments] ## Observability ### Logging -- Schema migrations -- Cache operations -- Query performance -- Error conditions +- [Key log points] +- [Log levels] +- [Critical events] ### Metrics -- Query response times -- Cache hit/miss rates -- Database size -- Operation counts +- [Performance metrics] +- [Business metrics] +- [System health metrics] ## Future Considerations ### Potential Enhancements -- Advanced caching strategies -- Full-text search -- Data compression -- Cloud backup options +- [Future feature ideas] +- [Scalability improvements] +- [Technical debt items] ### Known Limitations -- SQLite concurrent access -- Initial sync performance -- Cache memory constraints -- Platform-specific issues +- [Current constraints] +- [Technical restrictions] +- [Scope boundaries] ## Dependencies ### Runtime Dependencies -- expo-sqlite -- @react-native-async-storage/async-storage -- NDK (future) +- [External services] +- [Libraries] +- [System requirements] ### Development Dependencies -- Jest -- TypeScript -- SQLite development tools +- [Build tools] +- [Test frameworks] +- [Development utilities] ## Security Considerations -- Input validation -- Query parameterization -- Event signature verification -- Access control +- [Security measures] +- [Privacy concerns] +- [Data protection] + +## Rollout Strategy + +### Development Phase +1. [Development steps] +2. [Testing approach] +3. [Documentation needs] + +### Production Deployment +1. [Deployment steps] +2. [Migration plan] +3. [Monitoring setup] ## References -- NDK SQLite Implementation -- Nostr NIP-01 Specification -- POWR Exercise NIP Draft -- React Native SQLite Documentation \ No newline at end of file +- [Related documents] +- [External resources] +- [Research materials] \ No newline at end of file