mirror of
https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF.git
synced 2025-06-14 19:45:02 +00:00
56 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
56 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
![]() |
# Scan Upload Feature Improvements
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Code Improvements
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. **Modular JavaScript Architecture**
|
||
|
- Split the monolithic `scan-upload-direct.js` into logical modules:
|
||
|
- `logger.js`: Handles logging and status updates
|
||
|
- `peer-connection.js`: Manages WebRTC peer connections
|
||
|
- `camera.js`: Controls mobile camera functionality
|
||
|
- `scan-upload.js`: Main module that coordinates everything
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. **Separated CSS from HTML**
|
||
|
- Created dedicated CSS files:
|
||
|
- `scan-upload.css`: Styles for the desktop scan-upload page
|
||
|
- `mobile-scanner.css`: Styles for the mobile camera interface
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. **Improved Error Handling**
|
||
|
- Added better error handling throughout the codebase
|
||
|
- Improved user feedback for connection and camera issues
|
||
|
- Enhanced debug logging capabilities
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. **Backward Compatibility**
|
||
|
- Created a compatibility layer that maintains the old API
|
||
|
- Allows gradual migration to the new code structure
|
||
|
- Ensures existing integrations won't break
|
||
|
|
||
|
## UI Improvements
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. **Enhanced Responsive Design**
|
||
|
- Improved mobile layout with proper media queries
|
||
|
- Better handling of different screen sizes
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. **Better Visual Feedback**
|
||
|
- Clearer status messages for users
|
||
|
- Improved styling of the scan result display
|
||
|
- Enhanced debug information presentation
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. **Localization Support**
|
||
|
- Added proper Thymeleaf text references for all UI elements
|
||
|
- Uses the existing messages system for translations
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Security Improvements
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. **Enhanced WebRTC Implementation**
|
||
|
- Better handling of connection errors
|
||
|
- Improved security for peer connections
|
||
|
- Structured error handling for failed connections
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Next Steps
|
||
|
|
||
|
Potential future improvements:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Add more robust testing for the WebRTC functionality
|
||
|
2. Consider implementing a fallback method if WebRTC is not available
|
||
|
3. Add support for scanning multiple documents in one session
|
||
|
4. Implement better image quality control options
|